So is this what happens when the sotto voce budget costs are finally counted? What've they been listening to instead?
In a way, it's nice to see even the NYTimes falls prey to the faux spell-checker-fix-all on this front-page blurb (twice, no less!). More fuel for the fire when folks demand a spell-checker to help save their souls when a quick glance back would do a better job.
No comments:
Post a Comment